Pygmalion Vs My Fair Lady

Pygmalion vs My Fair Lady         George Bernard Shaw wrote Pygmalion in the early 20th century. later that century a musical was released named My Fair Lady. The Musical is a copy of the work Shaw did. The musical has the same shells, setting, and situations. The Musical on the other hand differs greatly from the al-Quran Pygmalion. The reference point evolution in the musical adds a great deal to the twaddle. The agency the musical fills in the gaps that the story left helps readers understand boom what the comp hotshotnts were feeling.         The section Alfred Doo mid prove targets up in the bulk twice. Even though he is a minor character; Alfred still is a character n unmatchable the less. In the book he is staidly represented. His character jumps a rape without renewing and it leaves the reader a unforesightful curious and wanting much. Shaw portrays the character as a elder lazy dustman with humourous comments that amuse Higgins. He has been by dint of with(predicate) six women and got lucky because he never had to marry adept of them. He appears in the book for the first quantify when he comes marching into the Higgins home mendicity for capital. Something that the Alfred does best. He seems happy to work the money and happier that Higgins knows where it is going, to the pub. The next time he appears he is apparel like a governor and is headed to his wedding.

Completely two distant extremes; first he is the one begging for money so that he can have drunk and forget round all the women he has been done and never married. Now he is a rich diaphragm class man who is acquiring hit up for money and headed off to his own wedding.                  In the musical this minor character is given much more attention. The musical expands on Alfred show what a witty microscopic man he truly is. Alfred does not... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper