Causal Determinism

Philosophy Mini Paper 1 Causal determinism claims that our past, sign conditions atomic number 18 deterministicly conditi championd by natural laws. Causal determinism deals with conditional predictability, which enunciates that if I know all of my past/present material conditions and natural laws, consequently I can know my future causative path. Since we al way of lifes standpoint our choices on our highest desire, we can easily predict what choices one is going to make. It seems really plausible for casual determinism to be true. With causal determinism on one cobblers last of the spectrum, and existentialism on the opposite end, we ready two conflicting philosophies of solicit vs logic.It seems only logical for us to assume that indeed, we base our decisions based upon what we deeply, real desire the most. The notion that we lack the capacity of free will, though, is daunting. To think that we withdraw no control over our lodges is really rather terrifying, so it beco mes genuinely apparent why someone would want to reject these theories. Causal determinism hasnt un forefendably affected my views of life dramatically, but it helps keep everything into a sensible perspective. To spanking a meaningful life its important to stay consciously, that is to say, to escape the hypnotizing do of living life monotonously.I believe that in order to live up to a lucid life, its important to retain existentialist aspects in everyday life. To live life on a path without the awareness of liberty seems like it would be similar to those nightmares we have in which we know the horrors that are closely to happen, but can do nothing to prevent it. To live a robotic life is too easy. To throw everything into the wind and say that we have no control over our lives is too easy. To say humanity has an inability to control itself is far too pessimistic and a twisted way to live ones life.Its empowering to believe in ones ability to make something of their life , to truly live life spiritually. I dont feel that causal determinism should impacts ones views on moral indebtedness drastically. To think that whatever is going to happen will happen anyway, and to avoid morality, is definitely a flawed way of thinking. Because of our desire to live in a morally praiseworthy fashion, we may let moral determine influence the decisions we make. We should not simply dis obedience everything happening in our surroundings because we think we have no control.As far as fellowship goes, yes, we typically befriend those that are like-minded in some regard or another. This isnt a new or unusual concept, this notion is wide known. There are countless psychological factors that are at serve with the ongoing process of friend-making. Causal determinism doesnt change what is already known about making friends. Love is one of the most confusing of human emotions. To say that on that point is a soul mate for each person would be agreeing with causal determi nism. It seems, in an odd sense, too romantic for the theory, but theyre one in the same regardless.Some believe in soul mates, that there is one person each is destined to belong with. It would make sense for a causal determinist to believe in the idea of a soul mate. Causal determinism feels far too depressing to follow sacredly in a day-to-day lifestyle. While the theory may be a logically correct way to look at life, it seems to potently strip away what it means to live as a conscious human. Sure its important to keep a balance of logic and beg in the way one lives their life, but it seems like following causal determinism may be tipping this scale too far to one side.