Emotion and Stress – Does Guilt and Sympathy Affect Helping Behavior?

Helping behaviour is perceived as socially bankable and extremely appreciated. Therefore, people melt to praise others when they have helped the needy. We used to cerebrate that only those people with positive personality, such as sensitive and kind, put to death service behaviors. Nevertheless, whether one symbolises good or not also greatly depends on his or her senseal states. Through this psychology project, I gear up that people ar more likely to perform a help behavior when they feel iniquitous or freehearted. Emotion is an indispensable dowery of humanity. It is a way for people to understand what they feel towards events and people around.Unlike lower-order animals, sense helps people to act like a human. Serial killers be emotionless. masses with emotionless whitethorn probably feel nothing when they atomic number 18 ache or harming others which are highly unacceptable in society. Since people tend to invade more when they are happy but withdraw from cu rsory activities when they are upset, we back end image that our behaviors are always determined by our emotions. Yet, people tend to perform more helping behaviors when they feel iniquityy or sympathetic. How do these negative emotions push people to help their neighbors? criminality is an emotion that occurs when people believe that they have violated a lesson standard while sympathy is the contact of being sorry for person showing that people understand and care about somebodys problem. They are both negative rather than positive emotions. People do not feel good when they are faulty or sympathetic towards somebody. Is that true people involve more in altruistic behaviors when they are disgraced or sympathetic? There is an experiment conducted by dungaree Decety (2009) who is a neuroscientist cogitationing the relationship between unrighteousness, sympathy and helping.He is a prof of Psychology at the University of Chigago and is specialized in affective neuroscience. I n the study, disciple subjects are required to ac tell apartledge their coworkers receiving shock. Some of them are made to take they are responsible for the coworkers suffering (guilt condition), while others merely observe the suffering (observer condition. There is also a gathering working with coworkers receiving no shock. Later the three groups are given opportunities to help a thirdly blow upy who is not in the original experiment.The resolve shows that subjects in the guilt and observer condition are more likely than the control group to give their helping hand to the third party. The finding suggests that the purport of guilt and sympathy and the willingness in good-natured in an altruistic act is highly correlated. Subjects are more willing to help others when they feel sorry for a third person even they do not responsible for their unfortunate. At the same time, altruism may aroused merely by witnessing ones suffering. There are three reasons for people who feel g uilty and sympathetic to engage in helping behaviors.Altruism is a form of disguised self-interest and helps in sensory system management while restoring ones self-image. People help others for their aver benefits. It is always unpleasant to watch other organism suffer. When one empathizes because of their misfortune, strong negative emotion is arisen. People are actually seeking to alleviate the unpleasant judgments that their distress arouse in them. It is a kind of internal self-reward. This flush toilet reduce the negative smell by saying they have at least through their part in helping the unfortunate. Therefore, altruism is the attempt to reduce the empathetic feeling that arises in people.Besides, people help others when they are guilty and sympathetic for mood management. Both guilt and sympathy are negative emotions which are unpleasant. Therefore, they can be reduced by performing a helpful act or any other positive means. In a study (Decety, 2009), subjects who had inflicted or witnessed an unfortunate situation bring ind an unexpected monetary reward. The result shows that subjects who received rewards are less likely than those who do not receive any and remain in bad mood in engaging helping behaviors. This indicates that helping is just one of the positive means which can uplift ones emotion.People are motivated to engage in altruistic act in order to alleviate the negative emotion associated with guilt and sympathy. Apart from that, when people feel guilty, they have probably done something wrong and regret for their actions. For instance, students have cheated in an examination. Their self-images are broken collectable to the negative behaviors performed. They understand that their behaviors are unacceptable and they do not pauperism to be perceived as bad. In order to restore the self-image in others eye, people will perform more pro-social behaviors.This is to prove that they are quiet the good guy. It seems to be upsetting that i f humanity performs a helping behavior just for reforming their own self-image rather than from a genuine feeling of guilt in helping others. Fortunately, it is not the case. Research suggests that unwitnessed transgression causes the same count of donation as witnessed transgression. Therefore, it is acceptable to conclude that people perform altruistic act are at least partly caused by the feeling of guilt but not a need to repair their own self-image in others eye. Undoubtedly, there is a use for these findings.Since many charitable organizations do very well the psychology of human, many of the fund-raising activities we can see in daily lives make use of peoples empathy. It is common to see volunteers showing photos of the needy in the less-developed countries persuading pedestrians to donate money to them. Guilty may arises as people may recall they have wasted a lot of resources and sympathy may arises as living conditions in those less-developed countries are really poor. With the arousal of these negative emotions, people may therefore engage in altruism.It is true that ones personality largely determines the likelihood in performing helping behaviors. Yet, our willingness in performing these behaviors also depends on the emotional states at that moment. The experiment done by professor, Jean Decety, proves that the feeling of guilt and sympathy can definitely facilitate altruistic behaviors. As a result, organizations may make use of this psychology as we know that even the meanest person may have the experience in helping others provided that they are at the right emotional state.